From the moment the movie started, I became interested. I was curious about the title, and these questions arose, 'Why is it entitled "The Fly"?' and 'Is the fly relevant to the story?'. It came out that the movie was about a scientist who tries to make a some kind of a teleport. The whole thing may be a little boring because of the quality of the video, it is an old film, and the story is quite predictable(doesn't have a lot of twists).
The film also discussed about the scientists during that time, it appears to me that all of the scientists are eager to find new discoveries, new inventions, that not one will help another since the other might copy his idea, etc. The scientist in the movie gave more of his time with his inventions, hungry for more technological innovations for mankind to use. Although this 'teleporter' doesn't exist up until now, I think it frustrates the scientists because in the first place, this portal isn't impossible.
I consider it a morality play although for me it doesn't fit well that the scientist wanted to kill himself because he thinks he and his ideas are no longer valuable since his invention didn't work well since his atoms and those of a fly were mixed up. But it gave us the idea and abstract of death. Another is that the wife tells the scientist not to use living creatures for experiment. There were many scenes having a moral value which I cannot tell one by one.
Basically, they were limited from high technological sources. The film showed how science and technology is a big deal for the people during the 1950's. It's as if one might risk his own life just to discover something. That was the period where every question needs to be researched by these scientists, that there shouldn't be a mistake before they introduce it to mankind. Just like the scientist from the film who aggressively makes his invention for the benefit of man, but unfortunately failed to do it. I'm thankful for the scientists back then, for they lessened our questions. But still technology is still improving itself, we cannot say what we might have in the future. Maybe Harry Potter's invisibility cloak, a time machine, or even a teleport.
I consider it a morality play although for me it doesn't fit well that the scientist wanted to kill himself because he thinks he and his ideas are no longer valuable since his invention didn't work well since his atoms and those of a fly were mixed up. But it gave us the idea and abstract of death. Another is that the wife tells the scientist not to use living creatures for experiment. There were many scenes having a moral value which I cannot tell one by one.
Basically, they were limited from high technological sources. The film showed how science and technology is a big deal for the people during the 1950's. It's as if one might risk his own life just to discover something. That was the period where every question needs to be researched by these scientists, that there shouldn't be a mistake before they introduce it to mankind. Just like the scientist from the film who aggressively makes his invention for the benefit of man, but unfortunately failed to do it. I'm thankful for the scientists back then, for they lessened our questions. But still technology is still improving itself, we cannot say what we might have in the future. Maybe Harry Potter's invisibility cloak, a time machine, or even a teleport.
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento